Followers

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Nov 2012 Writing: Women make better leaders than men' Sample Answer

My previous blog post deals with why it is so hard to score in the essay question. Please read up HERE before viewing the sample below. Also, if you really want to improve, please attempt to write your own essay first, or at least, do an outline of your essay so you can compare with mine. Cheers!


Women Make Better Leaders Than Men

The debate between the supremacy of the genders have been in session since time immemorial. In the past, it would seem that men had the upperhand but these days, women are starting to leave their mark in many aspects from business to politics rather than just domestic affairs. In my humble opinion, both men and women have the potential to be great leaders but the question of 'better leaders' does not lie in a person's gender alone but his or her innate character. In this essay, let us explore the qualities that make men and women great leaders before focusing on other factors that are unrelated to gender. 

First and foremost, men have some distinctive qualities that make them far better leaders than women. We can attribute this to the fact that men are generally physically stronger than women. This is undeniable because a man has clearly more muscle mass than a woman so in terms of leadership that has to do with physical ability, men win hands down. For example, in the army, most leaders are men that are buffed up and better able to handle the physical exertions of this field compared to women who are more delicate in structure. Men are also known to have better ability to strategise in terms of warfare and they seem to command their armies better. For example, great leaders have been men such as Napoleon Bonaparte, Genghis Khan, Hitler and so on. Moreover, men tend to be able to make quick decisions that are not usually based on their emotions but logical, rational and practical reasons. Women, however, seem to be very emotional creatures so they may make poor leadership decisions if they simply follow their feelings. Therefore, men have many qualities like physical strength, ability to strategise well and make snap decisions which can make them better leaders. 

However, women have proven to be better leaders in an increasing number of cases. This can be seen as more and more countries have entrusted women to be their leaders. These women have a more 'feminine' approach to leadership which is more sensitive towards the needs of society. For instance, history is peppered with exemplary female leaders such as Indira Ghandi, Benazir Bhutto, Eva Peron and present day heroines such as Aung San Suu Kyi. Women tend to be more caring in nature and quite patient in dealing with problems which makes them better leaders compared to men who could be less sensitive and impatient. Most women are also known to be perfectionists, and this is an advantage because they are often very meticulous and detailed in carrying out their duties as leaders. Thus, with a more open-minded society, an increasing number of women are being given the onus to take the lead and may even one day supersede men in their traditional leadership roles! 

Although I have gone to great lengths to show that both men and women have the ability to be great leaders, I still completely believe that 'leadership' has little to do with gender and a lot to do with a person's innate character. This means that to be a great leader does not depend on whether you are male or female but rather your personal characteristics that drive you to succeed. Men and women both possess the qualities of confidence, responsibility, time management and delegation skills, public relations and good communication skills, positive outlook, high commitment, creativity and innovation, forward-looking visionaries and many other characteristics of a good leader. Hence, the question of gender should not arise because being male or female does not guarantee the ability to lead well. 

In conclusion, history has shown that men make better leaders but this is a faulty argument because it does not take into consideration the fact in the old days women were discriminated against and not allowed to lead. Today, society is more open-minded and more women are taking the helm and proving that women can be better leaders. Nevertheless, leadership to me is 'genderless' whereby it is completely dependent on a person's positive characteristics which makes people respect them and want to follow in their footsteps. Every country needs more leaders regardless of gender so the government should conduct more self-improvement leadership courses for the younger generation so they may become better future leaders of our country.  


* Notice the words in blue. This is the correct way in order to mediate your sentences so they do not become OVER-GENERALISATIONS and/or SWEEPING STATEMENTS.

** If you prefer, you can always write an essay that agrees with one party or the other and you are more than welcome to email them to me so I can grade you according to the bands. :) Good luck and happy writing!







Monday, March 4, 2013

Nov 2012 MUET Writing 800/4 Academic Essay question

Women make better leaders than men. Do you agree? Discuss. You should write at least 350 words. 

Well the question above seems simplistic but the reality is that most of the students who took this exam last Nov, failed. Why did they fail when it would seem like a very debatable topic? It's not as if they had no idea at all as was the case with the 'arranged marriages' question.  After some research, I've come upon the main reason and this, I have to emphasise here, is entirely my own opinion, not MPM's.

So what is the main reason? Well.. simply put, lack of critical thinking skills. MUET teachers out there, I implore you to teach your students these 3 key concepts.

1. Argument, counter-argument and refutation.
2. Differentiating fact from opinion.
3. Quantifying overgeneralisation/sweeping statements.

The first two are relatively simple to teach as there are countless resources you can find... I remember blogging about No. 1 so you may be able to find it here, in fact... just click on the link HERE.

As for the third item, let me elucidate using this essay question.

Most of the candidates were unable to present mature arguments because they simply ended up with statements that are not based on fact but opinion. To make matters worse, they did not quantify the statement with the correct adverb of degree (some, a few, many, most etc) instead they used words like all, always, never. They also misused other adverbs such as too, very, every etc. Therefore the validity of the essay is seriously affected. It is therefore better to use modals like may, might and could to mediate your sentences to make it more acceptable and believable. A MUET examiner is able to spot a sweeping statement a mile away and you can be sure Bands 5 & 6 have flown out the window!

Let me show you some examples.

Women make better leaders than men.
Samples (a) are over-generalisations and (b) has been mediated to sound more credible.

1a) Women are too emotional so they will always make the wrong decision.
  b) Some women are very emotional so they may make wrong decisions.

2a) Men are very intelligent but women always never use their brains and cry all the time.
 b) Surveys have shown that men are more intelligent than women and can handle stress better.

3a) Men are better leaders because they invented all the things in the world.
  b) Men could make better leaders because they are intelligent enough to create most inventions.

(3a is a poor sentence because it is over-generalised as well as having faulty logic. 3b is better because it adds 'intelligent enough' thereby linking the two ideas to make it flow more logically.)


Basically, to write this essay well, one needs to be objective, neutral to an extent and able to discuss both the pros and cons before coming to a mature decision. So, would anyone like to submit an essay before I post a sample?

:) Happy penning!

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Nov 2012 MUET Report Writing question sample answer


Hi... 

Have you tried out the Nov report writing question? Here's my sample. 

Comparison of Quality of Facilities in 3 Colleges 

The stimuli present two tables, Table 1 on 'Rating of College Facilities' while Table 2 is on 'Fees, Scholarships and Numbers of Registered Students'. In general, institutions that charge higher fees tend to provide better facilities regardless of number of registered students and scholarships offered.

According to both tables, College C which collects the highest fees per semester (RM10,000) scored the highest ratings in all facilities except sports centre and food court.  It still managed to attract 5500 registered students although the number of scholarships offered were extremely low (10 only).

College A charges reasonable fees of RM6000 per semester and has the highest record of registered students (7000). It also has relatively good rating especially scoring top marks in providing wireless connection, food court and banking facilities. Another pull factor is that it offers the highest number of scholarships (500).

Meanwhile, students of College B rated its institution's facilities as mostly average to poor with only the sports centre achieving a good rating. The co-curricular centre, food court and transport received the lowest ratings. Although 100 scholarships are offered, this college enrolled the lowest number of registered students (1000).

In conclusion, the higher the school fees, the better the facilities provided.


Submitted by Blogwalker Josephine Wong... Great effort! I would give this quite a high band although she could have included a title and bit more data from the list of facilities. ANY MUET EXAMINERS WOULD LIKE TO GRADE THIS PIECE AND TELL US HOW MANY MARKS OUT OF 40 THIS STUDENT WOULD GET? (YOU CAN LEAVE ANONYMOUS COMMENTS U KNOW... :) 

Table 1 shows the rating of facilities at 3 colleges while Table 2 show their fees, scholarships and enrolment.
Generally, the visuals indicate that the higher the fees, the better the facilities and vice versa but this pattern has no bearing on the enrolment or scholarships offered.

College C is rated a high-end college with very good facilities (8 out of 10 facilities rated good). Its fees are very expensive (RM 10,000 per sem.) but the survey results show its enrolment is only moderate at 5,500 students. The college only awards 10 scholarships per year.

College B however, is a low-end college charging low fees ( RM4000 per sem.)  Its facilities are correspondingly rated average to poor and its enrolment is low (1000 students only). 

By comparison, College A is the most sought-after college (7000 students) with average to good facilities (all facilities rated as average and above) charging reasonable fees (RM6000 per sem). It also offers the highest no. of  scholarships (500).

To conclude, students are attracted to colleges that charge not-so-expensive fees but provide reasonably good facilities and has good scholarship offers.


So... what do you think? I'm imploring MUET writing examiners to please help us out by grading our samples... I'm just a teacher and have never claimed to be an expert in marking. So pleasssseee leave a comment for the benefit of all the MUET candidates out there... :) 

Thursday, February 28, 2013

My latest tips of writing MUET level Thesis Statements

Many students and teachers ask me how they should arrange their academic essays. Previously I have stayed loyal to the 5 paragraph format (to help the bands 1-2 get bands 3 at least) but these days I would like to challenge students to practice higher critical thinking by expanding their essays... A lot of them/you do not know how to develop ideas which include writing a good these statement and developing points. So here is my 'Every MUET Learner's Guide to Thesis Statements'.

PLS CLICK HERE FOR LINK TO GOOGLEDOCS

3rd MUET Seminar at University Tun Hussien Onn, Batu Pahat Johor 23/2/13

 I'm very grateful for the opportunity to conduct an 8-hour intensive MUET course at UTHM, BP, Johor for the 3rd consecutive year... I'm just happy that my words are meaningful and have the power to help shape a students' life, that he or she may go on to graduate with flying colours and carve a place for themselves in society. Tq to CARE (UTHM alumni) for calling me again and again and providing me the best services... the room as you can see above is really nice... hehe... De Mendez Homestay.
 I lost count of how many times I ate in one day... I think it was eight times... hehe.. from breakfast of nasi lemak.. to a heavy lunch of among others, asam ikan to mee racun (poison noodles!!!) and even supper of Burger Bakar.. yummers!
 My biggest group ever! 105 participants.. I'm sorry I didn't have time to get to know everyone personally but I will definitely put you all in my prayers!
 Haha... what a culture shock this dish is!!!
 My buddy Uzma sucking out the bone marrow with a straw!!! Freaky!!!!
 Here's me putting my 'expensive' signature on the certs... in total after three years I have signed close to 250 certs... so these are the lives that I have touched in my small way...
 Ok.. here's otak-otak... but its texture is weird.. like fishcake.. and the red colour is too drastic.. hehe...
 Oooops... how do I make this pic upright? Hmmm.. this tukang masak is very proud of his creations! Well done!
 My Valentine's burger bakar.. hehe
It's great to see everyone speaking in English... makes me glad to have chosen my profession... hope that whatever I shared will not go to waste.. and that like Miley Cyrus' message.... 'It's the climbbbbb...' so you should put all your effort into climbing higher and higher regardless of whether u reach the peak or not. :)

My next MUET seminar is at SMK Lohan, Ranau, Sabah on 9th March... so will update pics on that later.

Also another good news is that I've been approached by a website called 'HotCourses' and they have asked me to write a short article on my tips for MUET READING paper... I will upload here soon so everyone can reflect on my top tips.

Right, now that my internet connection is back, you can expect more posts soon. Stay tuned! 

Thursday, January 31, 2013

MUET Lesson Plans

Hi... I've been getting feedback from teachers wanting to know how I go about teaching my students and what syllabus do I follow. Frankly speaking, if I could be so honest, I am going to tell you that the syllabus is merely a guideline and you should follow your heart and your mind instead.

The first thing I do is assess the students... just a mental evaluation of what their level is like, how comfortable they are with the language and what 'skills' do they need to face the real world, ie uni life and working life. Give them some autonomy in deciding WHAT it is they want to learn more about.

So here is a run down of WHAT I teach...

1. My Grammar Formulas as the basis of all the lessons, including coded marking.
2. Egg Babies: Parenting Skills to teach them the values of responsible adulthood
3. Phonology and pronunciation lesson using a really cool handout with incorporates pictures as the phonetic symbols.
4. Vocabulary expansion using my Word Class worksheets, word scavenging through the dictionary.
5. Resume/CV writing, cover letters and mock job interviews (highly important and a MUST teach)
6. Academic writing using my template for very weak proficiency, and a more 'open' style for higher bands.
7. Academic essay compilation of minimum 50 essays a person (I get each one to write on a specific topic, then i painstakingly mark it using codes, students self-correct their errors and rewrite the final draft before copying everybody else's essay in their own handwriting, no photocopying, and use highlighters to indicate words/sections they like, comments etc)
8. Mock speaking activities (non-exam based: interviews/forums/presentations, exam-based: mock tests using the speaking templates I provide. I also have various activities for turn-taking, brainstorming, shadowplay technique etc.)
9. Report Writing (teach the format, do practices, find their own stimuli and write the report & present, copy each other's reports so they have a compilation of reports as well)
10. Reading Comprehension includes collecting reading materials from reliable sources (Reader's Digest, Time, Newsweek, The Star, The Edge etc and students design their own MCQs to test other groups) besides the regular model tests n actual exams.
11. Listening activities using the 'pause and play' technique, oral to written 'reconstruction' activity, model tests and actual exam practice and analysis..
12. Powerpoint presentations using the 'simulation' technique, usually a simulation of a business convention or a membership/support group drive etc.

At some point or another I have blogged about my activities, so if you'd like to ask me how I carry out a particular lesson I wl try my best to answer. :) Anyway, happy teaching people!

Oh and my seminar at Uni Tun Hussien Onn, JB is confirmed on 22 n 23 Feb.. so really looking forward to that now! Woohoo!



Monday, January 14, 2013

MUET 2013... another new year has dawned...

Hi people... I apologise for the long haitus... I've been so busy and just haven;t fount the time or the initiative to work this blog. Anyway, here are the latest issues I've found out.

Firstly, we were all shocked by the July MUET result which was appalling. According to reliable sources, the results were the worst ever for MUET in this country since its inception. Not a single Band 6 was recorded across the board where normally there would be at least 1 to 10 B6s every exam (very rough estimate, no proof available, sowwy). Anyway, my students took the final year exam and I was indeed hoping that MPM would be a bit more linient this time round considering the sad affair of the July paper. Turns out it is equally as bad and the results produced were in my personal opinion, horrendous!!!

Last year my school had only 5 B1s, but this year a grand total of 34 B1s were glaring at me from the report sheet, as if mocking my entire MUET career.... my only consolation is that no matter how badly we did compared to last year, when we compare it with other schools for the final year exam, we still managed to top the rest in the area as we had 2 Band 4s and a handful of Band 3s compared to some schools with all Band 1 and 2s only.... yeeesh! MPM officers, if you are reading this, I implore you to rethink the level of questions and marking as the standards are tooooo high. Considering these students need to pass in order to graduate, it would cost too much for them to retake it over and over again esp since you have made a quantum leap in terms of exam costs from rm60 to rm100 which is almost an 80% increase in fees. It begs the question whether this exam is simply a money making industry or ???? ... (not my opinion, but along the thoughts of most people, completely heresay).

Anyway, another issue I heard about the recent exam marking from some MUET examiners (sources undisclosed as it was a discussion AFTER marking was done and dusted and based on general comments only k) that the marking scheme is very stringent these days as MPM wants students to be able to look at the tables/graphs/stimulis and come up with the 'tersurat' and the 'tersirat' which in their terms are 'analysis' and 'synthesis'. If you dont know what that means, then it will be hard for you to score in the report writing section. They also had a field day deciding on the 'Overview' (second sentence of the introduction) because apparently there was NO general trend based on the question produced. After looking at the question, I could identify the 'general trend' but apparently it is not called that because it does not involve a timeframe. Duh??? Regardless, you still need an 'Overview' so just come up with a sentence that ties in the most outstanding features of ALL the stimuli. They really should vet the questions properly cos we are teaching according to their format and it would be ridiculous if the answers are not according to the format. Yeesh, go figure!

For the academic writing section, it is also harder to score these days because the arguments must be directly relevant to the issue in the question as opposed to the theme in the essay question. A very clear example of this is the July paper which asks students their opinion of the co-curricular criteria for entering university. If you simply answered that this criteria is good because it will teach students discipline, then you have not answered the question. The key is to tie it to the issue of if this skill will benefit them at university and how it will help them perform better in university. Anyway, what do I know what MPM actually wants, these are only my theories as to why so many students scored poorly that time round.

Another bone of contention is the listening paper. Many blogwalkers and students have written in complaning about their abhorred Listening paper marks.. and when I look at the results transcript for students in my school as well I am super shocked. Last year I had a student who got Band 5, scoring 45/45 for listening... but this year... the students in my school.... so many of them scored single digits.. and abt six of them scored only '2/45'. I mean.... TWO????? either I have a very weak lot of students or the listening paper was excutiatingly hard, meaning to say MPM's standard is way higher than average. I do hope they vet the questions extensively for the next paper so that the results tally and follow a more standard graph,..... but hey, again, who am I to question them. They probably know best, compared to an average teacher like me.

Right, so those reading this, thank you for staying tuned. I will be posting up sample MUET lesson plans and ideas which I am currently using for this year's batch. I will also attempt to answer the report writing question and the academic essay on women for last Nov's exam.... but even I am afraid that my answers will stray too far away from MPM's standard. Please be reminded that the objective of my blog is to help the low bands (1 & 2) achieve band (3 & 4) and if you want a Band 5 or 6, it boils down to the fluency and command of the language, and your ability to think critically. Good luck all! Toodles for now!